Was Derren Brown: Apocalypse fake? - Suck My Trend

Was Derren Brown: Apocalypse fake?


Many viewers tuned in to Derren Brown: Apocalypse last night on Channel 4 with a sense of nervous anticipation. The build-up to the show promised that for one man, the world as he knew it would supposedly end. The basic premise was that Derren Brown had chosen a man (who had applied to be on the show) who displayed signs of laziness, apathy, and general lack of lust for life, and would throughout the course of the programme make him realise the error of his ways. This involved convincing Steven that the world had been hit by virus-ridden meteorites, and that he was one of the lucky few who hadn’t been infected, meaning that he needed to escape the zombie-like others who had succumbed to the virus. The programme is to be continued next week, when we will learn Steven’s fate, and his reaction to the whole set-up.

My first reaction to the show was to question the morality of such an arrangement. How is it Derren’s place to judge whether somebody is not living life properly? And does the end really justify the means? Surely the therapy that Steven would have to go through after this programme would cancel out any character-building ‘progress’ that had been made.

However, a little Twitter-research presents a different response – the whole programme is fake. The evidence? Apparently, Steven Brosnan, the lacklustre twenty-something, is an actor. Various sources claim to have found the casting-call profile for Steven, as well as Facebook photos revealing that he had been filming on a BBC set. This casts a very different light on the two-part series, and it certainly avoids the morality issue if Steven was not as unsuspecting as Derren made him out to be.

Whether Derren Brown or Channel 4 will respond to these findings remains to be seen, but in the meantime a  number of viewers have certainly been disillusioned.

 

Image credit: http://derrenbrownexposed.tumblr.com/

 

You May Also Like:


  • Pingback: scam host thepremierhost.com

  • Pingback: Cool Restaurant WordPress Themes 2013

  • Pingback: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130111054337AAzWR1a

  • Pingback: Wordpress themes for photographers

  • Pingback: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieOv58EESNo

  • Pingback: туроператор по израилю

  • Treva

    I just thought it all looked like bad acting when I tuned into it. Not sure about these findings of him being proven as a professional actor, but it just ‘looked’ acted to me and I was suspicious.

  • http://twitter.com/bbcgoogle Rockin Ron

    Well done, didn’t see the film but good digging.

    • http://suckmytrend.com/ Ashley Pearson

      Thanks for your comment :)

  • Stublore

    The 2 “actors” side by side :) .

    • http://suckmytrend.com/ Ashley Pearson

      Good find :)

  • John

    • http://twitter.com/GraceSummon Grace Summon

      Interesting that he decided to respond. But then why was Steven Brosnan filming a BBC pilot with Adam Buxton, hmm?

  • arthur
  • Steve

    Of course its all fake. I’m surprised you were so impressed “Grumpymiddleagedman”?

    I’m half expecting DB to announce that the whole thing was an experiment in audience gullibility at the end of part two?

    So many blunders; the starter motor that turned when it was claimed
    the motor fuse had been removed; those awful cringe-worthy “Hollywood”
    low energy explosion effects, the lack of hysteria, , the endless
    “director” shots instead of surveillance shots; DB pretending to steer
    the actors, etc, etc?

    The whole thing would be impossible to contain; impossible to make
    water-tight; one small slip or discovery would expose everything; one
    injury leave CH4 open to litigation.

    The gormless “Steven” never seems to ask any questions btw. Normal
    people would have 101 questions within minutes of “waking” …. except a
    bad actor playing a stooge of course.

    It’s all an insult to intelligent people, but I guess many gullible
    people will be sucked in, believe it all, echo their belief to others,
    and then worst still, use that same “savvy” when they vote in the next General
    Election!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=772885592 James Harris

    We can’t all get to the bottom of this unless you post his name

    • http://suckmytrend.com/ Ashley Pearson

      It’s been posted everywhere now, along with some other comments here, check it out :)

  • Steve

    I was curious but I boycotted it because I thought it was immoral. Glad to hear it might be fake. It seems pretty cruel to me. Actually it seems deeply immoral. That was my first reaction. I couldn’t justify watching it to myself.

    When you think about it, would the BBC really give the go ahead? Apart from the experience being traumatic, it could mess with somebody’s mind afterwards. There is at least the possibility there. It now makes sense that this would not be allowed. This would never be allowed for academic research.

    Also, remember the Russian roulette thing? That was fake so it wouldn’t be a first. I think Derren actually comes from a tradition of trickery, as much as magic or psychology.

    If he were exposed to news reports and they were serious, wouldn’t he discuss it with people?

    (When I thought it was real, I wasn’t buying the change somebody’s life for the better thing either…seemed like a pretext or justification to get away with doing it for entertainment or a challenge.)

    • Steve

      Putting somebody into that place mentally for entertainment would just be :-O

  • mtgradwell

    Of course it’s fake. The whole purpose of Derren Brown’s shows is to test the gullibility, not of one specific test subject but of the public as a whole. The fact that the supposed subject is actually an actor is irrelevant, since he is not the actual subject of the programme. We are.

    • couldberight

      Totally agree…considering Derren’s reputation and brilliance in all other programs he has made…there is surely more to this than just a poorly made episode with poorly chosen actors and poorly scripted scenarios!!!

    • http://suckmytrend.com/ Ashley Pearson

      Entertainment purposes you’d say?

      • mtgradwell

        That, and the making of money, and the keeping of Derren Brown in the public eye. It shows that any publicity is good publicity. Even depicting yourself as the sort of unscrupulous manipulator who deliberately screws with people’s heads in ways that would be clearly both immoral and illegal if it was real is good. Or even being the sort of lazy apathetic idiot who would fall for such a scam. Being a real apathetic idiot and being depicted as one on screen might be considered bad news, but for an actor showing you can play the part can’t be bad; especially if, as is always the case with Derren, it can be shown that some people were totally fooled.

  • Pingback: Was Derren Brown: Apocalypse fake? | myFBshop

 
More in Social Media (49 of 156 articles)
facebook_chrome_notifications


Facebook has rolled out a new update to their Messages system. It looks and feels a lot better, but there ...